Here is typical information for the top ten client programs. Unlike previous statistics, Firefox users account for almost a half of the traffic to the site - usually Internet Explorer leads the pack with about 30%, but in November it was relegated to third position.
![](http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/106/1/320/63893/NovBrowsers.png)
![](http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/106/1/400/261349/novBrowserBar.png)
Internet Explorer 7.0 currently accounts for 2% of traffic, the first time it's appeared in the stats. The thing I found most surprising was the fact that more Firefox users were using the recently-released 2.0 version than anything else. 2% of users still use Firefox 1.0.
Rather less delightful is the fact that 20% of site traffic is spidering (though how come Yahoo has to crawl so much more aggressively than anybody else is beyond me). Perhaps the real message is that I need to put some more compelling content on the site!
5 comments:
I get slightly different figures from my site (which has a wide range of content, but still skewed towards the technical).
IE 7 6%
IE 6 41%
FF 2.0 18%
FF 1.X 21%
Others :
Opera 2.8%
Safari 2.7%
Unknown 2.3%
Mozilla 1.7%
Konqueror 0.5%
Fuzzyman
Your results are really strange for me. I checked a few sites from an international customer and found out:
USA: 60% MSIE 6.0, 11% MSIE 7.0, 11% Mozilla 5.0, 10% Google, 2.5% Yahoo
Germany: 64% MSIE 6.0, 8% MSIE 7.0, 17% Mozilla 5.0, 5% Google, 2% Yahoo
UK: 72% MSIE 6.0, 13% MSIE 7.0, 10% Mozilla 5.0, 1,8% Google, 1% Yahoo
Japan: 56% MSIE 6.0, 3% MSIE 7.0, 2.2% Mozilla 5.0, 28.8% Google, 6.2% Yahoo
The statics are generated by webalizer for November 2006
Arno: you are probably really highlighting the fact that the holdenweb.con site is so insignificant that no reliable statistical conclusions can be drawn from its readership figures :)
For corporate sites I see 73% IE6, 10% IE7 and 13% mixed mozilla/netscape/firefox. But what do I know, I only run a web analytics company :)
JackDied: Nice to hear from you, Jack, it seems a long time since Iceland. I am pretty sure you will find the difference between our figures is accounted for by the fact that my sample isn't large enough to be statistically significant.
Post a Comment