tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-496482.post8364750980349323522..comments2024-03-26T03:20:19.840-04:00Comments on For Some Value of "Magic": PyPy Continues to Catch UpStevehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15732819755000554717noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-496482.post-17778729004665810412008-07-13T12:32:00.000-04:002008-07-13T12:32:00.000-04:00Thanks, Mike. There's always way too much going on...Thanks, Mike. There's always <I>way</I> too much going on at PyCon to catch it all.Stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15732819755000554717noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-496482.post-77039925769364790002008-07-13T09:19:00.000-04:002008-07-13T09:19:00.000-04:00In his 2007 talk at US PyCon, Jim outlined the roa...In his 2007 talk at US PyCon, Jim outlined the roadmap for IronPython - which included supporting Python 2.6 and Python 3.Michael Foordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06229713779852499022noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-496482.post-76466061111046690052008-07-13T08:34:00.000-04:002008-07-13T08:34:00.000-04:00You are right in what you say about the relationsh...You are right in what you say about the relationship between 3.0 and the 2.X series. I'm not sure why you suggest that library support will be more difficult for 3.0, though.Stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15732819755000554717noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-496482.post-60604913801482384822008-07-13T07:08:00.000-04:002008-07-13T07:08:00.000-04:00Based on my limited knowledge about PyPy: * Python...Based on my limited knowledge about PyPy:<BR/> * Python 3.0 isn't out yet<BR/> * Python 3.0 will start out as an alternate, not the primary install. Python 2.x will remain the default interpreter for the next couple of years.<BR/> * Supporting the 3.0 language changes are not a big deal in PyPy.<BR/> * Supporting the 3.0 runtime library is a significant task.<BR/> * To support 3.0, it makes sense to first implement 2.6Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18016746533254151945noreply@blogger.com