tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-496482.post8337330493550569525..comments2024-03-26T03:20:19.840-04:00Comments on For Some Value of "Magic": Wave GoodbyeStevehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15732819755000554717noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-496482.post-70859822840706030572010-08-05T13:08:56.608-04:002010-08-05T13:08:56.608-04:00I think an important point that everyone seems to ...I think an important point that everyone seems to be missing is that the 'Wave' Google really developed and was hoping would take off was the API/protocol. The 'Wave' everyone is talking about is the demo application built in the protocol, which was a second class citizen to that protocol; intended as a showcase only. Very few people adapted applications to the protocol, and the demo app was... not very good.<br /><br />Wave was poorly marketed at best, and down right confusing. The point was the protocol, not the app, but the app became what people though Wave was because it was the only visible instantiation of the protocol. <br /><br />The API/protocol shows so much promise, and in my opinion is way ahead of it's time. The problem is asynchronous collaboration protocols are hard and confusing by their nature, and while Wave greatly simplifies things, the problems themselves are still conceptually difficult. On top of that, it is hard to see what applications _need_ the collaborative feature sets provided.<br /><br />As facebook apps and realtime connected apps on mobile devices take off (and they are) we will see something like Wave emerge. This will require people to get used to the new means of communication first, and derive the protocol from those use cases.<br /><br />Would twitter have taken off without SMS first becoming a standard and understood means of communication? No.<br /><br />Wave was just too early.Doug Napoleonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07331585381804299154noreply@blogger.com